Why There is No Direct Flight from India to China?
Geopolitical Tensions: The Elephant in the Room
One of the primary reasons for the lack of direct flights is the ongoing geopolitical tensions between India and China. Over the years, relations between the two countries have been fraught with border disputes, trade imbalances, and diplomatic rifts. These tensions reached a boiling point in recent years with incidents like the 2020 Galwan Valley clash, where soldiers from both nations lost their lives in a standoff along the disputed Line of Actual Control (LAC).
Although these skirmishes may not seem directly linked to air travel, geopolitical tensions often have far-reaching consequences, including restrictions on bilateral agreements that allow for the smooth functioning of industries like aviation. Direct flights require strong governmental ties and mutual trust, something that is currently lacking between India and China.
In response to escalating tensions, both countries have taken actions that have indirectly influenced air travel. For instance, visa restrictions, tariffs, and trade barriers have created a less favorable environment for business travel, reducing the demand for direct routes. Additionally, diplomatic disengagement means fewer high-level talks about expanding air travel services between the two countries.
Pandemic Impact: The Nail in the Coffin?
The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the already tenuous air travel links between India and China. Like many countries, both India and China imposed strict travel restrictions to curb the spread of the virus. China, in particular, adopted a "Zero-COVID" policy, severely limiting international travel to and from the country. India also experienced severe outbreaks, further diminishing the feasibility of launching or sustaining direct flights.
While many countries have now reopened their skies to international flights, the effects of the pandemic on India-China air travel seem to linger. China's cautious approach to reopening international flights and India's own economic recovery challenges have led to a slow rebound in demand for air travel between the two nations. Furthermore, many airlines that previously considered opening direct routes have either gone bankrupt or shifted their focus to more profitable markets.
Economic Factors: Supply and Demand
Economically, one might assume that the enormous trade volume between India and China would support robust air travel. After all, China is India's largest trading partner, and bilateral trade reached over $125 billion in 2021. However, trade does not necessarily equate to passenger traffic. The majority of trade between India and China is conducted via sea and land routes, meaning there is relatively less demand for direct air cargo services, let alone passenger flights.
Furthermore, airlines need to ensure that direct flights are profitable. Direct routes between countries are more expensive to operate, requiring higher fuel costs and crew expenses compared to routes with stopovers. Currently, airlines might not perceive the India-China route as profitable enough to justify the operational costs. The lack of business travel due to political and economic tensions, combined with lingering pandemic restrictions, means that the demand for direct flights may not yet justify the investment.
Operational Complexities: Logistics and Regulations
Launching a new direct flight route is not as simple as it seems. It involves regulatory approval, slot availability, and coordination between airports in both countries. Both India and China have highly regulated aviation industries, and setting up a direct route would require extensive cooperation at both governmental and operational levels.
Moreover, airlines operating on these routes would need to consider air traffic control constraints, weather patterns, and aircraft availability. Some airports in both India and China are extremely congested, making it difficult to secure the necessary slots for new direct flights. Additionally, the Himalayas, which sit between the two countries, pose significant challenges to flight paths, increasing fuel consumption and operational complexity.
Airline Strategy and Alliances: The Indirect Approach
Many airlines prefer to fly indirect routes that pass through third countries rather than directly between India and China. For example, airlines based in Singapore, Thailand, and the Middle East have thrived by offering connecting flights between India and China. These routes often provide more flexibility in terms of pricing and scheduling, making them more attractive to both airlines and passengers.
In fact, some airlines have established codeshare agreements that allow passengers to fly part of their journey on one airline and the remainder on another, through an intermediary country. This not only alleviates the need for direct routes but also allows airlines to circumvent political and operational roadblocks that may prevent direct services.
Aviation Bilateral Agreements: The Legal Framework
For a direct flight to operate between two countries, bilateral air service agreements (BASAs) must be in place. These agreements govern how many flights airlines from each country can operate and under what conditions. India and China have a bilateral agreement, but it has not been updated or expanded in recent years due to the aforementioned geopolitical tensions.
Without an updated BASA that encourages more flights, airlines may hesitate to invest in launching direct routes. Additionally, some industry experts argue that India's aviation infrastructure is not yet robust enough to support a significant increase in international flights, particularly to destinations like China, where regulatory standards and airport congestion are considerable.
Passenger Preferences: Indirect Flights as a Convenient Alternative
Interestingly, many passengers do not mind flying via an intermediate country, as it offers the chance for layovers in popular transit hubs like Singapore, Dubai, or Bangkok. These stopovers can often break up the long journey, allowing travelers to rest or even explore a new destination en route to their final stop.
Furthermore, connecting flights tend to be cheaper than direct routes due to the way airlines structure their pricing models. In many cases, passengers prioritize cost savings over convenience, further reducing the demand for direct flights between India and China.
The Role of Low-Cost Carriers
Low-cost carriers (LCCs) have revolutionized air travel in many parts of the world, offering affordable alternatives to traditional airlines. However, the majority of LCCs operate short- to medium-haul routes, and long-haul direct flights between India and China fall outside their typical business model. The operational costs of long-haul flights make it difficult for LCCs to compete on price, limiting the availability of direct routes between the two countries.
Environmental Considerations: A Green Future for Air Travel?
As concerns about carbon emissions and environmental sustainability grow, some airlines are rethinking the viability of long-haul direct flights, which tend to have a larger carbon footprint compared to connecting flights. By opting for more fuel-efficient aircraft and sustainable aviation practices, airlines could reduce their environmental impact. However, implementing these changes would require significant investment and may take years to materialize.
Is the Future of Direct Flights Between India and China Possible?
Despite the current lack of direct flights, the situation could change in the future. Improved diplomatic relations, increased passenger demand, and advances in aviation technology could all contribute to the eventual launch of direct routes. However, for the time being, it seems that the combination of geopolitical, economic, and operational factors will continue to prevent the establishment of direct flights between these two important countries.
While the idea of direct flights between India and China may seem appealing, the reality is far more complex. Whether due to political tensions, logistical hurdles, or economic constraints, the absence of these routes is a reflection of broader challenges in the relationship between the two nations.
Top Comments
No Comments Yet